Welcome to the Men's Night 2007 Season
Dec 19, 2007 | Posted by Chris RhindLAST BUT NOT LEASTLAST BUT NOT LEAST When the captains sit around a table in early May to draft 12 or more players for their teams they are faced with a list of about 130 members who have signed up to play in the MOLSON’S MEN’S WEDNESDAY LEAGUE. Some they know but many they don’t, particularly if they are new members. Each captain’s list shows the 9-hole MMWL handicap if they are returnees or an estimate thereof, provided by the pro-shop, if they are first timers. Last year’s records also show how many times players turned out. The maximum number of playing days was seventeen and a total of 15 players attended each week and were eligible for the Pepperwoods’ Invitational Dinner for the 100%ers last Fall As in any draft there is a predetermined sequence to the order of selection but the reality is that there is a self-imposed duty to select quickly when each captain has a turn. There is gratuitous encouragement from fellow captains to move the process along, should anyone falter so they all need help identifying the potential value of each player. The random or auction methods have given way to the draft system which we currently use. Every player knows that he was handpicked by his captain. This should give everyone a feeling of importance at least until the season starts! An added piece of information that would help the captains is the individual PROFICIENCY or EFFICIENCY rating. This would be the % of times that an individual’s score was used in relation to the number of matches he played. For example, our erstwhile head-pro, David Miller and our new head-pro Mark Cunningham scored for their teams each time they played hence their rating would be 100%. For the purposes of this exercise their scores were not included. The average PE rating for the rest of us was 60% meaning that, collectively, we contributed to our team’s weekly score 60% of the times we played. The individual ratings ranged from 94% to 27% and everything in between and don’t forget the %s are calculated on the number of matches individually played. When I had gone through our records to arrive at the results for every individual I thought that these ratings were a pretty good guide to who were the MOST VALUABLE PLAYERS on each of the teams, split between Gross and Net scorers. The Gross was generally a choice of one out of two players whereas the Net was the best of the remaining ten players on each team. There were some weeks when there were ties among the Net players but the system selected who was counted and these were the individuals I counted. In the following list of teams, not in the order in which they finished but numerically, the Gross player’s name and rating appears first and the Net player second. Here we go:- MOST VALUABLE PLAYERS - 2007 Team 1 Rick Trainor – 88% George King - 75% Team 2 Mike Watson – 77% Colin Lyons - 75% Team 3 Dave Murphy - 94% Tony Steele - 82% Team 4 Vince Marchesano – 93% John Allinotte – 77% Team 5 John Whitham - 69% Jim Stirling - 78% Team 6 Jim Carr - 93% Wally Sollows – 73% Team 7 Ted Lowen - 64% Jake Gourlay - 73% Team 8 Ted Broome - 67% ..Malcolm Elliott – 87% Team 9 Brian Morgans – 87% Vince Cosentino- 76% Team 10 Ted Szostak - 77% Haerold McCrum- 92% Team 11 Chris Kwiecen - 86% Martin Saleta - 90% Team 12 Frank Safian - 86% Bernie Hanna - 81% Of course, another way of looking at these results is that these people are the most consistent at exceeding or matching their handicaps. More power to them! Have a happy New Year everyone. Hope you sign up again in May. We can handle more than the 144 players we had last year by increasing the size of each team. Tell your friends who have not played in the MMWL to join the fun. This is my last blog of the year. That’s a promise.
Add an anonymous comment
| 0 Comments Nov 1, 2007 | Posted by Chris RhindLEST WE FORGETLEST WE FORGET The following is a re-print of Kevin Myer’s column from an April 2007 edition of The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.). It was entitled, "Salute to a brave and modest nation". Until the deaths of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan, probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops are deployed in the region. And as always, Canada will bury its dead, just as the rest of the world, as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does. It seems that Canada’s historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored. Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again. That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States, and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: it seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved. Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada’s entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle. Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, its unique contribution being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the " British". The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and fourth-largest air force in the world. The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated – a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity. So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality – unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Ackroyd have in popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers. Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of it’s sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves – and are unheard by anyone else – that 1% of the world’s population has provided 10% of the world’s peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth – in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia. Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular non-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia, in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace – a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit. So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac, Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun. It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. This past year more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well IF WE REMEMBER Missing their hearths and homes, some for the first time this December, will be 2,500 to 3,000 men and women of our Armed Services stationed in Afghanistan. A personal greeting with a message of support from home would make them aware that we will be thinking of them during Christmas or Hannukah and hoping for their safe return, mission accomplished. There is a system in place to receive and distribute your individual communication to our troops, even if you do not know the name of a specific recipient. Purchase a card, include a personal greeting and mail it to:- "Any Canadian Forces Member OP ATHENA P.O.Box 5058 STN FORCES BELLEVILLE ON K8N 5WC (for Kandahar based personnel) Or "Any Canadian Forces Member" KABUL 100 P.O. BOX 5113 STN FORCES BELLEVILLE ON K8N 5WL (for Kabul based personnel) Given that the 22nd Regiment, the Van Doos, are currently a significant part of our representation in Afghanistan, wouldn’t it be extra nice to buy a second card en Francais and include a message, in French, from our area. The recipient will likely be doubly surprised to hear from Canadians outside of Quebec. If you want further details about getting in touch with our forces overseas, log on to http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/Community/Messageboard/addresses-2_e.asp. Address the French cards to " A tous les membres des forces Canadiennes " and lets hope they lift a few spirits as they, hopefully, also lift a few spirits. .
Add an anonymous comment
| 0 Comments Oct 1, 2007 | Posted by Chris RhindWHITHER WENT THE TIME ?Whither Went the Time End of Season Summary Who: The 138 individual; members who chose to compete plus the 5 pros who volunteered to join in (didn’t they David?). What: The Men’s Wednesday League When: From May to September, 2007- a total of 17 weeks Where: The front nine at the Beverly Botanical Gardens and Golf Club Why: To experience and enjoy competitive Team contests in a balanced league. How: Persuading 12 fellow members to step forward and take on the role of captains of 12 teams to be built from a draft of all interested members, resulting in teams of 12 players, with each team matched against a different team each week. Result: A healthy, lively and competitive season, where we very team was in the weekly winners circle at least twice and 987.5% of the individual players featured on the money list by year end. SNAFUS were minimal. Resolutions… Never to be debated again??
Future Considerations
Next year, Jack Boddaert has volunteered to share the creation and posting of the weekly blogs, allowing me to ease out of being so closely involved in the MWL for the past 6 or 7 years through changing formats. Of them all, I believe that the 2007 model is the best we have ever had. I hope it just gets better. I am sure that Jack will be a breath of fresh air. He knows that I will always help out when needed but I have some grandpa-ing to attend to. One of my grandsons discovered the MWL web site and checks on the scores each Wednesday. Much to my chagrin his first comment was "what’s a UB?"- I think it’s time to move along. I am going to post one more blog before closing out the year. It won’t be golf related but you might find it informative so log on once in a while. LATE BREAKING NEWS. Pepperwods’ Second Annual Invitational is scheduled for Wednesday, October 17 at 7 pm in the Club Dining Room. Pepperwoods shows its support for the MWL by hosting a dinner for the 100%ers, who are listed in the adjoining side-bar and highlighted on the list of players displayed in the Men’s Lounge. These gentlemen have played in every weekly event of 2007, some have even played the entire 2006 as well. If you are unable to make it, please phone Paul, in advance. Bubba winners also listed in the sidebar will have to wait until Friday, October 19 for their trip to Osprey Valley G.C. Check with Mark, in the pro-shop, closer to that date for final arrangements. Financial Results or what happened to the money. Your $50 entry fee, collectively, was returned 100% in the prizes for the season long League and Playoff competitions. The Hole-in-One Fund was boosted by $1.00 per player, per week of your $11.00 charge. Since neither was won the Fund now totals $4,226 to kick start 2008. A further .50c per player, per week accounts for the fee we pay to golfscoring.net, owners of the computer system, which we use. Annually this works out to approx. $1,000. The total of the remaining $9.50 per player per week (your account will be credited for the overpayment in September), pays for the weekly team prizes, the Special Event in June, $1,000, the Special event in August, $1,000, the prize money for Closing Day, the prize table following that event and the unsponsored cost of the Bubba event. When the dust has settled and the final bills are in we expect to have a small surplus to cover expected software costs as we refine the system. Whatever remains will be carried forward to 2008.
Add an anonymous comment
| 0 Comments Sep 20, 2007 | Posted by Chris RhindDID THE FAT LADY SINGDID THE FAT LADY SING ? She must have because it’s all over for 2007 – and what a finish! When the top team gets knocked off by eighth place TEAM #7, captained by Chris Stogios, you have to know all’s right with the world. .Congratulations to Chris and his team of Bill Cox, John Gourlay, Terry Hendershot, Paul Henderson, Sam Ingraudo, Jack Kelly, Ted Lowen, Mark MacLennan, Paul Muldowney, Helmut Pankratz and Rob Petrie. They did it in style too, in recording the low team score of the night at 211. Warren Bamber's Team # 7 had to settle for runner-up spot to go along with it's already won League title. Rounding out the rest of the League prize winners we have Mike Rock’s Team # 3 holding on to third spot with a one stroke defeat of Team # 2 ( it just wasn’t their night ) and doing it without the Oakville Mafia to beef up it’s eight man squad. Stan Kudlat’s Team # 8 held on for third place despite being whipped by Frank Safian’s Team # 12 by a margin of ONE POINT!!! How ironic if Bernie Hanna’s last shot was the clincher! If it was it also locked up fourth place for Team # 12. With it’s 2-point victory over Team # 6, Terry Koshylanyk’s Team # 10 cemented the fifth and final League money placing. So, half the teams finished in the money, which is not a bad way to conclude a very competitive season. You will be interested to know that of the six winning teams, only two had drafted a pro, none of whom had a 100% participation record, which should answer questions that are often raised about the equity of the draft. Also along the same vein, and with Mark Marchesano tying David Miller for the low score of 35, the final standings for the Us versus Them, season long, unofficial competition was 7 wins for the members, six for the pros with 4 tied. You would have to conclude that we have some very competitive members who can, and do offset the value of having our pros participate in the MWL. The prize purses will be handed out at next week’s Closing Day Tournament and, if you haven’t already signed up you are urged to do so because it is a limited entry event. At the dinner which follows, there will be an extensive prize table provide by donors, the MWL and by head-pro David Miller. It will be worth attending and even if you cannot make the 4.00 pm Shotgun start, sign up to attend the dinner at 7.00 pm. Your name will be in the hat for the many draw prizes. If you would like to add to the prize table, please contact Mark Cunningham with your contribution, before next Wednesday. Last year we had a total of ten players who attended every week. This year the total grew to fifteen and, on behalf of their grateful captains and appreciative teams, we are pleased to recognize PETER BORKOVICH, IAN CAMPBELL, VINCE COSENTINO*, JOE FITZGERALD*, DAN GOODWIN, SAM INGRAUDO, PAUL MOFFATT, ED QUINN, CHRIS RHIND*, MIKE ROCK*, RUSS SNYDER, TONY STEELE, ADAM TAYLOR, RICK TRAINOR and GARY TUFF *. Those with an * after their names were also among the 2006 group of 100%ers. It’s no wonder that these guys are the first to be drafted each year! To the 138 members, the 5 pros, the 12 captains and the beautiful Wednesday weather, which all contributed to make the 2007 MWL season such a success, the committee expresses it’s thanks. We hope that the off season passes as quickly as did this golf season. And now onto 2008. I believe (?) Stan Kudlats was closest to the Bubba to complete the line-up for this event. I didn’t realize he could drive that short! Happy winter, everyone
Add an anonymous comment
| 0 Comments |
Men's Night Sponsors:
Sleeman Topper's Pizza Pepperwood Invitational
Pepperwoods (Paul) cordially in vites the 100%ers to a dinner at Beverly G & C Club dining room on Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 at 7.00 pm. The following are invited Peter Borkovich Ian Campbell, Vince Cosentino, Joe Fitzgerald, Dan Goodwin, Sam Ingraudo, Paul Moffatt, Ed Quinn, Chris Rhind, Mike Rock, Russ Snyder, Tony Steele, Adam Taylor, Rick Trainor, Gary Tuff.
100%ers are those members who participated in every league game during the 2007 season. Regrets only directly to Paul at 905-628-2285.
CLOSEST to the BUBBA 1. Dan Goodwin 2 Mike Watson 3.Frank Safian 4.Vito Bommarito 5. Glenn Attridge 6.Derek Jones 7.Wally Sollows 8.Monty Kaminer 9. Paul Henderson 10. Dave Murphy 11. Doug Rice 12. Jeff Fox 13. Jeff Mason 14. Adam Taylor 15. Brad McFadden 16. Stan Kudlats
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


